Monday, June 11, 2007
Caleigh Tierney's reflection
After researching this ongoing event, I believe that Human Rights aren’t always regarded, and people’s rights are violated on a daily basis. Before researching this issue, I had thought that human rights were only being violated in Darfur, and maybe some small cases in other parts of the world. I didn’t think that it would be as extreme as it is in Chechnya. This relates to Chechnya because some of the same human rights were violated. Like the right to know why you are being legally detained, and the fact that they were illegally detained, and tortured. In the event that is going on with the Chechens, I don’t believe that the ideals of humanism are being supported, they are denying the principle to the people of Chechnya. The idea that all individuals matter is disregarded everyday, and the importance of individuality is lost. Chechens are killed, just because of their Chechens, and they believe that they are all against them. Even journalists who speak out, are brutally murdered in cold blood. So, the idea of humanism cannot be applied to Chechnya at all/. On leadership I believe that you need a strong, and fair ruler, not one that makes decisions for everybody, but discusses it. I don’t really believe in leaders, unless its in a form of a democracy. In this situation, the leader, Putin, was bot a good one. He was anything but fair to the Chechens, and just tortured them, trying to convince them to join the rest of the country. Yes I pity the victims, because they were wronged, and treated horribly. The events that took place, aren’t, and will never be justified. In fact, theres no way these acts against the Chechens can ever be justified. They violated their human rights. There aren’t any peacekeeping efforts in any countries right now to begin with. They aren’t acceptable in e first place, because the efforts of peace aren’t a priority, and nobody makes the effort to uphold the efforts, and protect the rights of people. So the peacekeeping efforts in sovereign countries aren’t acceptable to me at all. First of all, the government wouldn’t allow the United Nations to intervene with the sovereignty of the United States, so it wouldn’t happen. And I don’t think that anything that The UN wanted to change, the government. Even though it is their right, I don’t believe that the United Nations has the right to intervene in our country. I think that they can do it to other countries, because America hasn’t been that bad, and I believe that in America, we try to be fair, and do make an effort to uphold peacekeeping efforts, unlike other countries such as Chechnya, and Darfur. Like America even tries to help those devastated countries. So in America’s case, I don’t believe that the United Nations has the right to intervene on the United States.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Caleigh- How can u say that it's okay for the UN to interfere with other countries but not ours? Put yourself in the place of a Chechen. You have to face the fear of being attacked every day, and one of you family members has "disappeared" after being detained. You would obviously want the help of anyone, especially the UN. The United States doesnt have as many problems or inflict pain on other countries as much, but we're not perfect either. Just look at the war in Iraq. The UN hasn't done very much to help the Iraquies, but they really should be doing more in my opinion. It's a similar thing to Chechnya, because the US claims to be taking ant-terrorist action, although not really to the extremes like Russians have in Chechnya. If we were in a time of suffering, or in the case of Iraq by making others suffer, it would be the rightful place of the UN to step in. The UN needs to able to help keep the peace in any country, they don't get to pick and choose, nor do foreign countries get to choose if they want their help. As long as measures need to be taken for peace, and the government isn't doing it, the UN should help any country.
-Christina Garbarino
I'm a bit confused. The UN can't interfer with the US, but they can with the other countries? The UN tries to give equal oppertunities to every country, so how is it fair if they couldn't touch the US? Are you trying to say the UN shouldn't interfer with what is happening in Chechnya? Thousands of people are being killed, and it's not right to stop it? The job of the UN is to keep the peace, and to protect people's human rights. Why shouldn't they be allowed to do this? If this was the Holocaust would the UN be allowed to step in? Of course, because it was on a larger scale, they would. Just because thousands instead of millions are suffering means the UN can't do anything? It may reach millions if the UN can't do anything.
-Kate
Post a Comment